Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-08-08 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 50, having a general score of 81.2 against 81.2. The LG V40 ThinQ is an much older phone than Motorola Edge 50, but LG could make it just a little thinner and a little lighter anyway. These devices come with Android OS (operating system), but LG V40 ThinQ has the previous 10 version while Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14.
LG V40 ThinQ features an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Motorola Edge 50 counts with just a bit better looking display than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1220 x 2712 and a quite inferior pixel number per inch in the display, it also counts with a little bit larger screen.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge 50 takes much clearer pictures and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a way bigger camera sensor taking way better quality pictures and videos and a back-facing camera with a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.