Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-08 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 50, having an 87.1 score against 81.2. LG Velvet has the same thickness and weight than the Motorola Edge 50. The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a much better looking display than LG Velvet, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1220 x 2712px and a bit higher quantity of pixels in each display inch.
The LG Velvet counts with a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The LG Velvet counts with a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a bit better camera than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same video definition, the same diafragm aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a more mega-pixels back facing camera and a way larger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photos.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with better battery lifetime than LG Velvet, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.