Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2024-08-08 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.66 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 is slightly better than the Galaxy A22, getting an 81.2 score against 76.1. Both phones in this review include Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 has a more recent 14 version while Galaxy A22 has Android 12, so it gives you a couple additional features. Motorola Edge 50 is a incredibly newer phone, and it's also just a little bit thinner and a little lighter than Galaxy A22.
The Galaxy A22 has an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. Motorola Edge 50 counts with an incredibly better screen than Galaxy A22, because it has a way better resolution of 1220 x 2712px, a little bit larger screen and a lot higher pixel amount per inch of display.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a slightly bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy A22, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 has a really longer battery duration than Galaxy A22. Motorola Edge 50 takes much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a higher 50 MP resolution back-facing camera and a way higher video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.