Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-08-08 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 has a score of 88.3, which is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 50's overall score of 81.2. The Samsung Galaxy S10 design has the same thickness than Motorola Edge 50, but it is somewhat lighter. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S10 has the older 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14 version.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 50. Both of them have 8 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit. Motorola Edge 50 features a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1220 x 2712 pixels and a quite lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a little larger display.
Motorola Edge 50 features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture and worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a camera in the back with much more mega pixels and a lot bigger sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
The Galaxy S10 has a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 50 has a much longer battery life than Galaxy S10, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.