Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2024-08-08 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 9.4 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 is much better than Motorola Edge 50, with a 93.4 score against 81.2. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 has the previous 13 version and Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14. The Samsung Galaxy S22 is an extremely older phone than Motorola Edge 50, but it's just a bit thinner and a little bit lighter anyway.
The Galaxy S22 has a little bit better looking screen than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a quite smaller screen, less bright display, a little less pixels per inch of screen and a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution. Galaxy S22 has an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 50. Both of them have 8 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 features much more memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S22, because it has 128 GB more internal memory. The Motorola Edge 50 has longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy S22 takes slightly better videos and photos than Motorola Edge 50, and although they both have a back facing camera with a 50 mega pixels resolution, a same size sensor and a same size aperture, the Galaxy S22 also has a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.