Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2024-08-08 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Black |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | -- |
| 444 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.66 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting an 81.2 score against 80.1. The Motorola Edge 50 is a way newer cellphone, and it's also way lighter and a lot thinner than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 has older 14 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Motorola Edge 50 features a bit sharper display than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a bit lower 1220 x 2712 pixels resolution and a just a little inferior number of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a much bigger display. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Motorola Edge 50 features more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 50 counts with just a little better battery duration than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot higher resolution back facing camera, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a way better (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.