Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-08-08 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a global score of 92.3, which is better than Motorola Edge 50's 81.2 overall score. Galaxy Z Flip 5G's construction is just a bit thinner than Motorola Edge 50, but it is a bit heavier and was released 4 years before. These devices include Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14 version.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a brighter display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a bit higher resolution of 1220 x 2712px and a just a little greater display density. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality and the same diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a camera with way more megapixels.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has as much memory for applications and games as the Motorola Edge 50, both of them have exactly the same 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 features a very superior battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.