Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-07 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| LTPS | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 8 is slightly better than Moto G 5G, having an 85 score against 81.5. The iPhone 8 construction is notably lighter and notably thinner than the Moto G 5G, even though it was released many years before. Apple iPhone 8 has a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto G 5G, although it has a way worse resolution of 750 x 1334px, a quite worse screen pixels density and a really smaller screen.
IPhone 8 has a bit bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage. IPhone 8 has a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has less CPU cores and 2 GB less RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
Motorola Moto G 5G shoots slightly better pictures and videos than iPhone 8, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Moto G 5G also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera and a bigger aperture for better images and video in low-light situations.
The Motorola Moto G 5G features a superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a 175 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.