Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-07 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| LTPS | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS Max is a bit better than Moto G 5G, with a general score of 84.5 against 81.5. Apple iPhone XS Max's body is incredibly thinner and just a bit lighter than the Moto G 5G, despite of the fact that it was released 2 years before. IPhone XS Max counts with a brighter screen than Moto G 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1242 x 2688 pixels and a little bit better pixel density.
Motorola Moto G 5G features much more storage capacity for games and applications than iPhone XS Max, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Motorola Moto G 5G also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. IPhone XS Max has a better hardware performance than Moto G 5G, because although it has less cores , and they both have the same RAM amount, the iPhone XS Max also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
Motorola Moto G 5G shoots a bit better photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS Max, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Moto G 5G also counts with a much higher resolution camera in the back and a bigger camera aperture to capture better images and video in low-light environments.
Motorola Moto G 5G counts with a very superior battery lifetime than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.