Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-12-07 | 2020-12-21 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| LTPS | LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G 5G has a score of 81.5, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A12's overall score of 80.3. Both of these phones work with the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't notice any differences in that aspect. Although the Motorola Moto G 5G is better than the Galaxy A12, it must be noted that it is also a little heavier and thicker.
The Moto G 5G features just a bit better screen than Galaxy A12, because it has a better pixel amount per inch in the screen, a quite larger screen and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Samsung Galaxy A12 counts with a bit superior processor than Motorola Moto G 5G. They have a 4 GB RAM and 8 processing cores.
The Moto G 5G captures clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A12, and although they both have a 48 mega pixels resolution camera, the Moto G 5G also has a larger aperture for better captures in low-light environments and a much higher (4K) video quality. Samsung Galaxy A12 features slightly more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Moto G 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A12 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A12 counts with a battery duration that's just as good as Motorola Moto G 5G's battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.