Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android |
| 2020-12-07 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| LTPS | TFT |
| 393 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 is slightly better than the Motorola Moto G 5G, getting a global score of 84.7 against 81.5. Although Samsung Galaxy A32 and the Motorola Moto G 5G were released only 2 months apart, Samsung Galaxy A32 is a little lighter and just a little bit thinner. Samsung Galaxy A32 comes with Android OS, while Motorola Moto G 5G comes with Android 10 OS.
Motorola Moto G 5G has a bit better processing power than Galaxy A32. They have a 4 GB RAM and 8 CPU cores. The Motorola Moto G 5G has a better display than Galaxy A32, because it has a lot better 1080 x 2400px resolution, a little bit bigger screen and a better count of pixels per display inch. Motorola Moto G 5G features a little bit better camera than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same 30 fps video frame rate and a back facing camera with a 48 mega-pixels, the Motorola Moto G 5G also has a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photos and videos.
Galaxy A32 features a bit more storage for games and applications than Moto G 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A32 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1 TB. The Moto G 5G and the Samsung Galaxy A32 feature quite similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.