Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android |
| 2020-12-07 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is better than Moto G 5G, having a overall score of 90.5 against 81.5. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has Android operating system, and Moto G 5G has Android 10 operating system. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G's body is just a little lighter and thinner than the Moto G 5G, even though it was released about 15 months before.
The Galaxy A90 5G has a bit better display than Moto G 5G. Both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a same size screen and a better quantity of pixels per inch in the display. The Galaxy A90 5G features a bit more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G 5G, because although it has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB against 1000 GB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy A90 5G features a bit more powerful CPU than Moto G 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy A90 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy A90 5G counts with just a bit better camera than Moto G 5G, although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for shooting pictures or video in poorly lited environments, they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same (4K) video quality and a same resolution camera in the back.
Moto G 5G counts with a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.