Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-12-07 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Black and Gold |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G 5G has a general score of 81.5, which is slightly better than Galaxy C9 Pro's score of 81. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but Moto G 5G has an older 10 version and Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Even though the Moto G 5G is much newer than Galaxy C9 Pro, it is somewhat heavier and much thicker.
The Moto G 5G has a slightly better display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little bit larger display, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a quite greater quantity of pixels in each display inch. Moto G 5G has a bit better performance than Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
Moto G 5G features a much better memory for games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the Moto G 5G also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The Moto G 5G features improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Moto G 5G shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a much better (4K) video definition, a back camera with a way better 48 mega pixels resolution and a larger aperture to capture better photos and video in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.