Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-12-07 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| LTPS | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto G 5G has an overall score of 81.5, which is just a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's global score of 77.8. Although the Moto G 5G is a lot older and thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's construction is still a little lighter. Both devices in this review include Android OS, but the Moto G 5G has an older 10 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with an incredibly better looking display than Motorola Moto G 5G, because it has a just a little more pixels per inch of screen, a larger display and a lot better 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution. The Moto G 5G has a very superior hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better camera than Moto G 5G, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a camera with more megapixels and a way better video quality. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a superior memory to store more games and applications than Moto G 5G, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Motorola Moto G 5G, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.