Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 60.3 | 64.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4.3, 4.4.2, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2013-11-13 | 2019-06-10 |
| 5.11 x 2.59 x 0.46 inches | 6.01 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink, Red, White and Yellow | Black |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 99.00 | $ 90.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 326 pixels per inch | 293 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 SDM429 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 504 GPU |
| 8.37 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.82 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.8 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2070mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2990mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 350 hours standby time | -- |
| 4 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 3.1 A has a global score of 64.8, which is a little bit better than Moto G's overall score of 60.3. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Nokia 3.1 A has a newer 9.0 Pie version while Moto G has Android 5.0 version. The Nokia 3.1 A body is a lot newer and somewhat thinner, but just a bit heavier than the Moto G.
The Motorola Moto G counts with a brighter screen than Nokia 3.1 A, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little bit lower resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels, it also counts with a little bit higher number of pixels in each inch of display. Nokia 3.1 A features a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Moto G, because it has 32 GB internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 128 GB.
The Nokia 3.1 A has just a little better processing power than Moto G, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, and they both have a Quad-Core processor, the Nokia 3.1 A also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory. Nokia 3.1 A shoots much clearer photos and videos than Motorola Moto G, because it has a much more mega pixels camera and a much better 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution.
Nokia 3.1 A has a very superior battery life than Motorola Moto G, because it has a 44 percent more battery size.
Nokia 3.1 A not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also cheaper, which makes buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.