Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 60.3 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4.3, 4.4.2, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 4.0 |
| 2013-11-13 | 0000-00-00 |
| 5.11 x 2.59 x 0.46 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink, Red, White and Yellow | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 99.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.37 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.3 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| -- | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.82 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| SIM | Micro SIM |
| 4.8 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2070mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 350 hours standby time | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 4 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S III Cricket is much better than Moto G, getting a 71.5 score against 60.3. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S III Cricket has 4.0 version and Moto G has Android 5.0. Galaxy S III Cricket is a a little bit lighter and extremely thinner cellphone than the Moto G.
Motorola Moto G counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1280 x 720px resolution, the Motorola Moto G also counts with a bit better pixels count per inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket features a much better memory to install games and applications than Moto G, because it has 24 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 64 GB.
Galaxy S III Cricket has a bit superior CPU than Moto G, because although it has a slower 400 megahertz graphics co-processor and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with 1 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket takes much better pictures and videos than Moto G, because it has a much more megapixels camera and a much better video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket and Motorola Moto G feature very similar battery performance, although the Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket also has a 2100mAh battery capacity instead of 2070mAh.
The Galaxy S III Cricket costs a little more money than the Moto G, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.