Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone X is much better than Moto G Stylus, getting a score of 88.1 against 79.7. Despite of the fact that iPhone X is much older than Moto G Stylus, it's construction is a little lighter and thinner. IPhone X has a superior performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and 2 lesser cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
IPhone X has a much better looking screen than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution and a just a bit higher pixels amount in each inch of screen. Moto G Stylus has slightly more memory capacity for games and applications than iPhone X, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Moto G Stylus features a much better camera than iPhone X, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Moto G Stylus also counts with a lot larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a back camera with a lot higher resolution and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light images and video.
The Moto G Stylus counts with a very superior battery duration than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 2716mAh.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto G Stylus, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G Stylus. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the Moto G Stylus, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.