Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus, getting an 82.5 score against 79.7. Google Pixel 2 XL's body is somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter than Motorola Moto G Stylus, although it was released many years before. The Google Pixel 2 XL features a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a greater pixels density.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a little bit better processing power than Moto G Stylus. They have 4 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core CPU.
The Moto G Stylus shoots much better photos and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Moto G Stylus also has a bigger aperture for better images in poorly lited environments, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot better image and video quality and a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with a bit superior battery duration than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3520mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Google Pixel 2 XL is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.