Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has a general score of 80, which is just a bit better than the Moto G Stylus's 79.7 global score. The Google Pixel 3 design is a lot lighter and thinner than Moto G Stylus, despite of the fact that it was released just 18 months before. Google Pixel 3 features a slightly better looking display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater display pixels density.
Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with a way bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and more internal memory capacity. Google Pixel 3 features a little faster CPU than Moto G Stylus. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus has a much longer battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2915mAh. Motorola Moto G Stylus takes better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a bigger aperture, a camera with way more mega-pixels and a lot bigger sensor taking way higher quality videos and pictures.
Google Pixel 3 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.