Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus, with a score of 81.9 against 79.7. The Google Pixel 4 body is thinner and lighter than the Motorola Moto G Stylus, even when both of them were released only a couple of months apart. Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit sharper screen than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels amount in each display inch.
Motorola Moto G Stylus has a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit better processing unit than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 4 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Moto G Stylus counts with a better camera than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Moto G Stylus also has a back-facing camera with a way higher 48 mega pixels resolution and a way larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Moto G Stylus counts with a very superior battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
The Google Pixel 4 costs a little more money than the Moto G Stylus, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.