Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Just black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a has a general score of 82.9, which is a little bit better than Moto G Stylus's 79.7 overall score. The Google Pixel 4a construction is way lighter and somewhat thinner than Moto G Stylus, even though both were only released 4 months apart. Both of these devices work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so they should provide all the same OS features.
Google Pixel 4a features just a bit better display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher screen density and a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. Google Pixel 4a counts with just a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4a also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Moto G Stylus has a way bigger storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Moto G Stylus also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G Stylus has greater battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus features a much better camera than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same aperture, the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a lot higher resolution back camera and a way larger camera sensor which gives a lot better photo and video quality.
Google Pixel 4a costs more money than Moto G Stylus, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.