Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G Stylus, having an 87.6 score against 79.7. The LG V60 ThinQ construction is just a little thinner but heavier than the Motorola Moto G Stylus, and both of them were released with only 1 months difference. Both of these phones come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so both should give very similar operating system features.
LG V60 ThinQ features a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a just a little worse display pixel density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 and a little bit larger screen. LG V60 ThinQ features a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V60 ThinQ has just a little better processing power than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 4 GB more RAM. The LG V60 ThinQ features superior battery duration than Moto G Stylus, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery capacity. The Moto G Stylus takes better videos and photos than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing less light and washed colors, a way worse video quality and a way less MP resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light photography.
LG V60 ThinQ costs a bit more money than Moto G Stylus, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.