Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-04-16 | -- |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | -- |
| 6.77 ounces | -- |
| Mystic indigo | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A34 has a global score of 82.9, which is a little bit better than Moto G Stylus's general score of 79.7. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A34 has the newer 13 version while Moto G Stylus has Android 11 version. Samsung Galaxy A34's construction is thinner and notably lighter than the Moto G Stylus.
Galaxy A34 has just a little better hardware performance than Moto G Stylus. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM amount. The Samsung Galaxy A34 features a bit sharper screen than Moto G Stylus, because it has a quite larger screen, a little bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a just a bit greater display density.
The Moto G Stylus has a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A34, because it has more internal storage and a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. Motorola Moto G Stylus captures much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A34, and although they both have a camera in the back with a 48 mega-pixels resolution and the same sensor size, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a bigger diafragm aperture.
The Galaxy A34 counts with improved battery performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a 25% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.