Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Stylus is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A70, getting a 79.7 score against 76.9. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Moto G Stylus has a more recent 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version, so it counts with lots of additional features and some performance improvements. Moto G Stylus is a newer phone than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it's somewhat thicker and just a bit heavier.
Galaxy A70 counts with a screen that is just as good as the screen in Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although the Galaxy A70 has a bit worse display pixels density, it also counts with a little bit bigger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Galaxy A70 counts with just a bit better processing power than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A70 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy A70 and Motorola Moto G Stylus both feature extremely similar storage for games and applications, both of them have a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB and the same 128 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Moto G Stylus features a greater camera than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same video resolution, the same diafragm aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a way larger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
Galaxy A70 features a bit superior battery performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a 13 percent larger battery size.
The Moto G Stylus costs a bit more than Samsung Galaxy A70, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.