Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 78.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-04-16 | 2017-04-07 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Blue and Gold |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Metal |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G Stylus is just a bit better than Galaxy C7 Pro, having a 79.7 score against 78.4. The Motorola Moto G Stylus is a incredibly newer cellphone than Galaxy C7 Pro, but it is heavier and extremely thicker. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Moto G Stylus has the previous 11 version and Galaxy C7 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
Moto G Stylus and Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro feature quite similar screens, although the Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro has a little bit smaller screen, a just a bit worse pixels count per inch in the display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro counts with a little faster processor than Motorola Moto G Stylus. Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount.
Moto G Stylus counts with a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB and more internal storage. The Motorola Moto G Stylus shoots way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a back-facing camera with a way better resolution, a much higher (4K) video resolution and a bigger aperture to take better low light images and videos.
The Moto G Stylus counts with longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.