Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-03-07 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M30 has a global score of 82.4, which is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G Stylus's general score of 79.7. Galaxy M30's body is a little bit lighter and just a bit thinner than the Motorola Moto G Stylus, even though it was released around 14 months before. These phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy M30 has newer 9.0 Pie version and Motorola Moto G Stylus has Android 11 version, so it gives some extra features.
The Moto G Stylus has just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy M30, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy M30 features a screen that's just as good as Moto G Stylus's display, and although the Galaxy M30 has a just a little less pixels per screen inch and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2280px, they both have a screen of the same size.
Motorola Moto G Stylus takes a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy M30, because it has a much higher (4K) video quality, a bigger camera aperture to take better photography in low-light situations, a way bigger camera sensor shooting way better quality photos and videos and a way more MP camera.
The Samsung Galaxy M30's storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is very similar to Moto G Stylus's one, both have a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB and equal internal storage capacity. The Galaxy M30 counts with better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a 25% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.