Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 397 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 is better than Motorola Moto G Stylus, with a 90.8 score against 79.7. Although the Galaxy Note 20 and Motorola Moto G Stylus were only released 4 months apart, the Galaxy Note 20 body is just a bit thinner but a little heavier than Motorola Moto G Stylus. The Galaxy Note 20 features a little sharper screen than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a just a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a little bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400.
The Galaxy Note 20 features just a little better performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a larger amount of RAM. Motorola Moto G Stylus features a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy Note 20 features just a bit better battery performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity. Moto G Stylus counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing less light and duller colors, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Moto G Stylus also counts with faster video frame rate, a much more megapixels back-facing camera and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photos.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto G Stylus, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto G Stylus. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Moto G Stylus, and give up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.