Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 is just a bit better than Moto G Stylus, having an 81.2 score against 79.7. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 3 has an older 5.0 version while Moto G Stylus has Android 11. Even though Galaxy Note 3 is way older than the Moto G Stylus, it's body is just a little thinner and lighter.
Galaxy Note 3 counts with a bit superior processing unit than Moto G Stylus, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM and an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with an additional graphics processor. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a sharper display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, although it has a quite smaller screen, a quite lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a bit lower pixels density.
Motorola Moto G Stylus captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a much bigger aperture, a way larger sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photographs and a way better resolution camera.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus features a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G Stylus has superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.