Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 is much better than Moto G Stylus, getting a general score of 89 against 79.7. Galaxy Note10's construction is lighter and thinner than Moto G Stylus, although they were released only 8 months apart. Galaxy Note10 has a slightly better screen than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2280px resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater display pixel density.
The Moto G Stylus has a slightly bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note10, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for taking pictures or videos in low-light environments and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also counts with a much more MP camera and a much larger camera sensor capturing much higher quality photographs and videos.
The Moto G Stylus counts with a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto G Stylus, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G Stylus. If you want to save some money, you can get the Moto G Stylus, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.