Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G is much better than the Moto G Stylus, getting a global score of 93.6 against 79.7. Both phones we compare here include the same Android 11 operating system, so both of them should give the same OS features. Despite of the fact the Galaxy S10 5G is older and a bit heavier than Moto G Stylus, it's design is still somewhat thinner.
Galaxy S10 5G has a bit superior processing unit than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S10 5G also has more RAM. Galaxy S10 5G counts with a little sharper screen than Moto G Stylus, because it has a higher 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution, a bit bigger screen and a greater pixels quantity in each display inch.
Motorola Moto G Stylus has a better camera than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a tinier camera aperture and worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor and a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
Motorola Moto G Stylus has a slightly better memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has just a little better battery duration than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a 13 percent bigger battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G costs a bit more money than the Moto G Stylus, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.