Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus, with an 86.3 score against 79.7. Samsung Galaxy S10e's construction is somewhat thinner and lighter than the Motorola Moto G Stylus, although it was released around a year before. The Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a slightly better looking display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2280, it also counts with a bit more pixels per screen inch.
Galaxy S10e and Motorola Moto G Stylus both count with very similar storage to store more apps and games, both of them have an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB and the same 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy S10e features just a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S10e also has more RAM.
Moto G Stylus features superior battery performance than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 29% greater battery capacity. The Moto G Stylus shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller camera aperture and lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto G Stylus also counts with a back camera with lot more MP and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy S10e is more expensive than Moto G Stylus, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.