Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-04-16 | -- |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | -- |
| Mystic indigo | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has a global score of 80.9, which is slightly better than the Moto G Stylus's overall score of 79.7. The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active is a a little thinner and extremely lighter phone than the Moto G Stylus. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has 5.0 version while Moto G Stylus has Android 11.
Galaxy S6 Active has a better performing CPU than Moto G Stylus, because although it has lesser RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64-bits processor and an extra GPU. Galaxy S6 Active features a much better looking display than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a better count of pixels per screen inch.
The Moto G Stylus has a very superior storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 128 GB internal memory. Motorola Moto G Stylus has just a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. Moto G Stylus takes way better photos and videos than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Moto G Stylus also has a way bigger sensor providing a much better image quality, a back facing camera with way more mega pixels and a bigger aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.