Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-16 | -- |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Black Shadow |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| $ 300.00 | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is better than Moto G Stylus, getting a general score of 91.1 against 79.7. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has the newer 14 version and Moto G Stylus has Android 11 version. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition construction is notably thinner but heavier than Moto G Stylus.
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a more vivid display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little inferior pixels number per screen inch, it also counts with a bigger screen and a better resolution of 1968 x 2184 pixels. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Moto G Stylus, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Moto G Stylus has a much faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has 12 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has just a bit better battery lifetime than Moto G Stylus, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
The Moto G Stylus has a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because although it has a camera with lot less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better photography and videos in low-light situations.
Although Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto G Stylus, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto G Stylus. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Moto G Stylus, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.