Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is a little bit better than the Moto G Stylus, having a overall score of 86.6 against 79.7. Despite being the best we are comparing, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 design is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than Moto G Stylus. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has older 10 version while Moto G Stylus has Android 11.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a bit better CPU than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bigger screen.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a bit better camera than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also counts with a back-facing camera with a way better resolution, higher video frame rates and a bigger camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Motorola Moto G Stylus has a lot bigger memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has an 18% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.