Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2022-04-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4650mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G Stylus is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, with a score of 79.7 against 78.7. These devices have Android OS, but Motorola Moto G Stylus has the previous 11 version and Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro has Android 12. Motorola Moto G Stylus is an older cellphone than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, but it is lighter and just a little thinner anyway.
The Moto G Stylus counts with just a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2300 pixels, it also counts with a bit higher quantity of pixels per inch of screen. The Moto G Stylus features a slightly better storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus has a very superior performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a 16 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro captures a bit better photographs and videos than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a much tinier sensor capturing lot worse quality videos and photographs and a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro also counts with higher 60 fps video frame rate and a back facing camera with a way better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.