Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2024-07-19 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2488 x 2224 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 417 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 is a bit better than Motorola Moto G Stylus, with an 84.3 score against 79.7. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 body is way newer and incredibly thinner, but also heavier than the Motorola Moto G Stylus. Both devices we compare here use Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a more recent 14 version while Motorola Moto G Stylus has Android 11, counting with a couple nice extra features and performance enhancements.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a way better looking screen than Moto G Stylus, because it has a little bit greater screen density, a lot better resolution of 2224 x 2488 and a larger display. Moto G Stylus features a bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Moto G Stylus has a very superior performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with longer battery lifetime than Moto G Stylus, because it has a 5100mAh battery size against 4000mAh. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a little bit better camera than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 also has a much larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a much better photo and video quality, a lot better video resolution and a camera with more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.