Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-04-16 | 2018-11-23 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.42 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 397 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G Stylus is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, with a 79.7 score against 77.2. The Moto G Stylus design is newer than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro's, although it is just a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Moto G Stylus has older 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has Android 8.1 Oreo.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro counts with a bit better screen than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2280px, it also counts with a little greater pixels density. Moto G Stylus counts with a superior memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory.
The Moto G Stylus counts with a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Moto G Stylus captures much better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has a way higher 3840x2160 video definition, a lot better resolution back-facing camera, a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a bigger aperture for better photography and video in poorly lited environments.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro's battery lifetime is just as good as Moto G Stylus's battery lifetime.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.