Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | ZTE |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a general score of 80.2, which is slightly better than Moto G Stylus's 79.7 score. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but ZTE Axon 10 Pro has older 10 version and Moto G Stylus has Android 11. ZTE Axon 10 Pro's body is thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Moto G Stylus, although it was released just 11 months before.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a slightly better looking display than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a just a little less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features just a little better hardware performance than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Moto G Stylus has a slightly better camera than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, although it has worse video frame rates, they both have the same diafragm aperture, the same 3840x2160 video definition and a same resolution camera in the back. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal storage capacity.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro and Motorola Moto G Stylus feature very similar battery performance.
Although ZTE Axon 10 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto G Stylus. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy ZTE Axon 10 Pro, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola Moto G Stylus, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.