Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel XL has a score of 81.3, which is a bit better than the Moto G7's score of 75.2. Even though the Google Pixel XL is way older and just a bit thicker than Moto G7, it's body is still just a little lighter. The Google Pixel XL has a little sharper screen than Moto G7, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a better count of pixels per display inch.
The Google Pixel XL has a processing unit that's just as good as the Moto G7 one, and although the Google Pixel XL has an inferior number of cores , they both have the same RAM memory amount. Google Pixel XL features a bit better camera than Moto G7, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Google Pixel XL also counts with a back facing camera with a better 12.3 megapixels resolution.
The Motorola Moto G7 features more storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel XL, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Google Pixel XL features a little better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G7, because it has a 3450mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto G7, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G7. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the Moto G7, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.