Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.84 ounces |
| Lucent White and Midnight Blue | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 930 MT6855 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| IMG BXM-8-256 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 has a general score of 90.8, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G73 5G's general score of 73.8. The Galaxy Note 20 body has the same thickness than Motorola Moto G73 5G, but it's extremely heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a much better performance than Motorola Moto G73 5G. Both of them have a 8 GB RAM and 8 CPU cores.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a little bit better looking display than Motorola Moto G73 5G, because although it has a just a little lower count of pixels per inch in the display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a quite bigger display.
Moto G73 5G and Galaxy Note 20 both count with incredibly similar storage to store more apps and games, both of them have the same internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a camera that is just as good as the Moto G73 5G one, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a way less megapixels camera in the back, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video quality.
The Moto G73 5G has greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.