Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 5.93 ounces |
| Lucent White and Midnight Blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 930 MT6855 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| IMG BXM-8-256 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 is much better than Moto G73 5G, having an 81.2 score against 73.8. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 3 has 5.0 version and Moto G73 5G has Android 13. The Galaxy Note 3 is a much heavier phone than Moto G73 5G, but both of them have the same thickness.
The Galaxy Note 3 features a sharper display than Moto G73 5G, although it has a little worse pixels number per inch in the screen, a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a little bit smaller screen. Moto G73 5G features a little bit more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a really superior hardware performance than Motorola Moto G73 5G, because although it has less CPU cores (but faster) and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a GPU. Motorola Moto G73 5G captures much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Moto G73 5G also has higher video frame rates, a camera with way more MP and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light images and video.
Moto G73 5G has a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.