Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.03 ounces |
| Lucent White and Midnight Blue | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 930 MT6855 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG BXM-8-256 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note5 is just a bit better than Motorola Moto G73 5G, with a overall score of 80.2 against 73.8. The Galaxy Note5 has a more vivid display than Moto G73 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel count per inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Moto G73 5G has much more storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note5, because it has 64 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy Note5 features a very superior hardware performance than Moto G73 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Motorola Moto G73 5G counts with a superior battery performance than Galaxy Note5, because it has a 67 percent more battery size. Motorola Moto G73 5G features a slightly better camera than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Motorola Moto G73 5G also has better 60 fps video frame rate, a back facing camera with way more megapixels and a larger aperture for better images and videos in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.