Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.78 ounces |
| Lucent White and Midnight Blue | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 930 MT6855 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| IMG BXM-8-256 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 is way better than Moto G73 5G, getting a overall score of 94.8 against 73.8. Both devices in this comparison review use the same Android 13 OS (Operating System), so they should provide you identical OS features. Samsung Galaxy S20 has a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto G73 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S20 counts with a sharper display than Moto G73 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a better pixel density. Galaxy S20 takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Moto G73 5G, because although it has a camera with a much lower 12 MP resolution, and they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S20 also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S20 has much more storage to store more games and applications than Moto G73 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola Moto G73 5G has greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has a 25 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.