Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.83 ounces |
| Lucent White and Midnight Blue | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 930 MT6855 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| IMG BXM-8-256 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is way better than the Motorola Moto G73 5G's global score of 73.8. Both of these phones come with the same Android 13 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any differences in that aspect. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much better looking display than Motorola Moto G73 5G, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px, a better number of pixels per inch of screen and a bit bigger display.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G73 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a very superior processor than Motorola Moto G73 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Moto G73 5G and the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G count with incredibly similar battery performance. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes much clearer photos and videos than Moto G73 5G, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a way more MP camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.