Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.36 ounces |
| Lucent White and Midnight Blue | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 930 MT6855 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG BXM-8-256 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 has a global score of 79.5, which is a little bit better than Moto G73 5G's global score of 73.8. The Samsung Galaxy S7 features a way better performance than Moto G73 5G, although it has a lower number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM. Galaxy S7 features a much sharper screen than Moto G73 5G, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The Moto G73 5G counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and video, and they both have the same (Full HD) video quality, the Moto G73 5G also counts with higher video frame rate and a camera in the back with lot more megapixels.
Motorola Moto G73 5G features more memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. Moto G73 5G has a superior battery duration than Galaxy S7, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.