Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 5.75 ounces |
| Lucent White and Midnight Blue | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 930 MT6855 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG BXM-8-256 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S9 has a general score of 83.3, which is better than Moto G73 5G's 73.8 global score. The Samsung Galaxy S9 design has the same thickness than Moto G73 5G, but it is notably heavier. The Galaxy S9 counts with an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Moto G73 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy S9 features a better display than Moto G73 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2960 resolution and a better amount of pixels per inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G73 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 400 GB.
Motorola Moto G73 5G counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 67% larger battery capacity. Moto G73 5G captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy S9, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Moto G73 5G also counts with a lot more MP back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.