Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.35 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.64 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Neon blue and Pearl white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V20 is a little bit better than Moto G8, getting a general score of 77 against 74.4. The LG V20 is an incredibly older phone than the Moto G8, but LG was able to make it a little lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. The Motorola Moto G8 counts with a bit better performance than LG V20, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Motorola Moto G8 also has more processing cores (but slower).
The LG V20 has a better looking screen than Moto G8, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much better number of pixels per inch of screen and a way better 1440 x 2560 resolution. LG V20 features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G8, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the LG V20 also has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
LG V20 features a bit better camera than Moto G8, although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking photos in low-light situations, they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same video definition and a back facing camera with a 16 mega-pixels. The Moto G8 counts with better battery life than LG V20, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3200mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the LG V20 is also by far the cheapest one, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.