Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.35 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.64 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Neon blue and Pearl white | Black and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 237.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is just a bit better than Moto G8, with a overall score of 77.8 against 74.4. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro's body is noticeably newer and notably thinner, but also heavier than Moto G8. Both devices in this comparison come with Android OS, but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a more recent 14 version and Moto G8 has Android 10 version, so it counts with lots of additional features and performance tweaks.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better looking display than Motorola Moto G8, because it has much more pixels per screen inch, a larger screen and a lot better 2200 x 2480 resolution. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola Moto G8, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The Moto G8 counts with a way better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures greater photographs and videos than Moto G8, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a camera in the back with a much better 50 megapixels resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better battery duration than Motorola Moto G8, because it has a 43 percent greater battery capacity.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto G8, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Moto G8. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Motorola Moto G8, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.