Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-09-14 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| -- | 5.57 ounces |
| Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue and Viva Magenta | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto G84 has a general score of 80.9, which is a little bit better than the LG V30's 79.1 score. Even though Moto G84 is a bit thicker than the LG V30, it's noticeably lighter and also much newer. The LG V30 features a much more powerful processor than Moto G84, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Moto G84 counts with just a bit better looking display than LG V30, because although it has a way lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a bit inferior count of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a quite bigger screen. Moto G84 shoots better photos and videos than LG V30, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for capturing images and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Moto G84 also counts with better 60 fps video frame rate, a lot larger sensor shooting much higher quality videos and pictures and a much more mega pixels back camera.
LG V30 features a bigger memory for applications and games than Motorola Moto G84, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Moto G84 features a much better battery duration than LG V30, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.