Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android |
| 2020-09-07 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.88 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Blush gold and Navy blue | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 387 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 has a general score of 84.7, which is a little bit better than Moto G9 Plus's general score of 80.5. The Galaxy A32 comes with Android OS, and Moto G9 Plus counts with Android 10 OS. The Galaxy A32 construction is just a little thinner and just a bit lighter than the Moto G9 Plus, even though both of them were only released 5 months apart.
The Moto G9 Plus counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy A32, because it has more pixels per display inch, a little larger screen and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Motorola Moto G9 Plus has a little bit better memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Motorola Moto G9 Plus features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A32. They have 4 GB of RAM and 8 cores. Moto G9 Plus and Galaxy A32 count with really similar batteries. Moto G9 Plus captures much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Moto G9 Plus also has a much higher resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.